[media-credit name="Snigdha Sengupta" align="alignnone" width="150"]
[/media-credit]Few in the Indian startup eco-system understand young entrepreneurs and their travails as well as Laura Parkin, currently executive director of the Wadhwani Foundation. She is also a co-founder of NEN (National Entrepreneur Network), which is promoted by the foundation. Her earlier career has seen her play diverse roles, ranging from serial entrepreneur to venture capitalist to merchant banker. Parkin blogs at Venture Out, which offers a delightful blend of entertaining writing and serious intent. Here’s her latest post.
Ok People. Place Your Bets
By Laura Parkin
“I’d take all the youngsters to the horse track and make them bet!” exclaimed the well-known entertainment entrepreneur. This was his proposal for acclimating people to entrepreneurship. I was speechless; probably a good thing.
But we hear variations of this theme all the time: entrepreneurs are gamblers. Entrepreneurs are risk-takers. I hear that that one key thing holding people back from becoming entrepreneurs is their unwillingness to take a risk.
I challenge that premise.
Most Indian graduates long for placements in multi-national corporations (MNCs), or large Indian companies. Indeed, an Infosys placement commands a premium in the marriage market.
I contend that these youngsters are the real gamblers. I contend that the young people signing up for jobs in large corporates are assuming more risk than many of their counterparts headed to start-ups, or starting their own ventures.
Consider the placement scenario over the past few months – I know of young people who received offers from highly regarded MNC’s, but then never received their appointment letters.
As in most large companies, the decision to terminate the jobs was taken by people far removed, who were looking at the overall picture of the company. Perhaps the conversation went like this, “We need to trim the bench from 10% to 2%.” “Ok, we’ll cut the new hires in Bangalore.”
And these would-be-new hires couldn’t do a single thing to change their fate. They couldn’t prove their worth by working harder; or improve circumstances by identifying a new opportunity for the company or by changing strategy or pricing. Nothing. It was as if they had placed their chips at the roulette wheel, and then watched the ball land another number.
Contrast that with what might have happened in a start-up, or in their own venture. Everyone faces tough times. But in a start-up, perhaps they could have found another customer. They might have volunteered for extra work to speed up product development. Or negotiated a better deal with suppliers to save some money.
It may not have worked. But the point is that they could have tried something; they had a measure of control.
And in the course of trying, they would have learned something, improved their skills, or met people for the next opportunity. What can you learn, sitting at home, waiting for an appointment letter? Or shoe-horned into a cube, working on a piece of code?
So, who is better off, even in the worst case scenario? Who took more risk?
Everything in life carries some risk. Perhaps it’s about where one wants to place a bet. Do you want to bet on someone you don’t even know? Or do you want to bet on yourself?
Note: This post has been re-produced at Startupcentral with prior permission from the author, Laura Parkin

Pretty convincing. Just a couple of observations though. You view it through a slightly narrow prism -that of the recent past when the global economy melted and the corporate sector as a whole turned out a risky place to be in.. But stretch the period a bit to include the boom years and I think an entrepreneur who chucked a cushy job at the peak and set up his/her own shop only to realise that the market has tanked did take a relatively higher risk… However I do agree that a job with an estd company is no longer as risk-proof as it appears to be. Hence the perceived ‘risk gap’ so to speak between working as a salaried employee and striking out on one’s own could well have reduced
Sure, applying for a job has risks now. so does crossing the road, changing the fuse, driving on indian roads..there’s no comparison between a person who ventures out (ironically the name of Laura’s blog) to ‘create’ a product that doent yet exist and someone who decides to bet on a proven ‘name’ !!
Usually one apprectiates Laura’s insightful blog posts (ref – electriciyt is the main problem ent faces in india) but this is a bit over extended!
“But in a start-up, perhaps they could have found another customer. They might have volunteered for extra work to speed up product development. Or negotiated a better deal with suppliers to save some money.”
REALLY!! I’d love to hear from business owners who’re able to do any of the above as casually as the writer mentions it!