Archive for June 2008

Is Expedia Buying Travelguru?

There’s some confusion. Or shall we say competition? News reported first by VC Circle this morning said that Expedia has bought a majority stake in Mumbai-based travel services portal TravelGuru. The report puts the size of the deal at $17 million and additionally, Expedia reserves the right to up its stake in TravelGuru in future. Simple enough so far. But just I am about to compose my thoughts on how the ongoing consolidation in the online travel space has moved to the next level, comes this denial of sorts on the deal from TravelGuru CEO Ashwin Damera at Medianama.

Anyway, I did some asking around within the venture capital community and I’m inclined to believe both reports are right and wrong. Some deal seems to have been initiated but the terms, it appears, are yet to be finalized. TravelGuru is the smallest in terms of revenues among leading online travel services firms — the unconfirmed estimate is $2 million. It trails Makemytrip, Yatra and Cleartrip, necessarily in that order. For a larger perspective on the online travel business and its current state of affairs, read this Outlook Business report.

Green Money for the Third World

Venture capitalists invested $210 million in cleantech companies in India in 2007, up 58% from 2006, says Cleantech Group in a February press release. The organization, which has Vinod Khosla among others on board, thinks clean energy and water are key opportunity areas in India for investors. There’s been some activity in terms of raising India-specific funds for cleantech — more here.

Going by the US and European deal flow reports, globally every fourth or fifth deal in the early stage category seems to be in a cleantech company. It is probably time to look at this sector in a more disciplined manner, especially since a clutch of local venture capital teams here are sizing up the market. A few names are familiar, among them Nexus India Capital, Draper Fisher Jurvetson and Baring Private Equity.

In other notable news this week, one more online media startup hit the road. Nikhil Pahwa, the former editor of Contensutra in India, launched his own outfit Medianama on Friday.

Inventus Launches $125 Million India Fund

Inventus Capital, the new venture capital fund backed by Silicon Valley-based entrepreneur Kanwal Rekhi is finally off the ground. The fund has a $125 million corpus and was formally launched in Bangalore two days ago. The firm intends to invest in 15-20 early-growth companies and will invest not less than $1 million and not more than $10 million per company, says the press release.

Rekhi, who is also a founding member of TiE,  said in an interview with Mint that his fund’s US-India cross-border investment strategy would only begin to play out in 2008 because the timing was right. He is looking at embedded software, mobile services, and knowledge process outsourcing among others.

On another note, interesting to see TiE buddies Saurabh Srivastava, Sridhar Mitta and BV Jagadeesh pop up on Inventus’ investment/advisory team.

How Startups are Picked at Proto.in

We are almost done with the finalists. This edition has been trickier to shortlist because of two reasons. For one, I am experimenting with a new way of shortlisting these candidates. And two, we got quite a bit of good companies this time, and going from 19 to 15 is where the problem is right now. I really wish there was unlimited time, energy, mentors and space to showcase these companies at times.

By now most of the companies that did nominate would have heard back from us. If you haven’t gotten any response from us, do get in touch with us immediately. We did find one case of a nomination filing that had hidden itself away in the SPAM folder, so I am ensuring that it hasn’t happened twice.

So the information is the same. You will be seeing 15 companies being showcased at this edition and I am quite excited to say that some of them have some fabulous patents and years of industry depth and understanding in what they are doing. This event will be one not to miss.

How does the selection process work?

Coming back to the brief hint that I made about the selection process, folks within the team would tell you that I’ve always been against the idea of a single committee of people evaluating companies. When we meet companies that are as diverse as Internet, mobile, telecom, software, enterprise, animation and food processing (yep, we have one company on that space), the fixed panel model really doesn’t work. The selection has always been a case where a pool of people are accessed for their expertise on the sector. Given that Proto.in has connections in most verticals from semiconductor fabrication to people who’ve built businesses in the Internet space to people who do keep an eye on the next wave or trend, it is essentially utilizing them in the right mix where the magic comes in.

This process has been working so far, and thanks to the bigger pool of companies who have been at Proto.in before, there is a portfolio being created which is becoming even more resourceful when it comes to validating some of the market hypothesis for these emerging companies – which is the most crucial help a startup could get.

Let me explain it in simpler terms. The selection process is quite simple. For every company, once we understand the vertical, a set of folks who are closely associated with that sector, and companies who can be potential clients for them are put in touch with the company and asked to converse. We sit and listen to the conversation. What we expect is not a perfect company, but for a team and product that listens, and evolves quickly on its feet and makes use of the opportunity to cash-in on some of these introductions and potential partnerships. I am seeing a slew of very happy ‘non-accepted’ companies this time, because even if they weren’t ready to go on stage (which is the only reason we hold back a company) the validation of customers and mentors gives a jolt of advice and direction that compares to none other.

Truth be told, I’m very pleased with the outcome that we’ve been trying out. I’m very glad that the role that Proto.in had determined to play for these companies – in giving them a spark of life – comes in much earlier into the game itself, which is beneficial for everyone.

I’ve been getting questions on the nomination and selection process for quite sometime now. I hope this gives some clarity on the situation.

About the columnist: Vijay Anand is a serial entrepreneur and curator of startup showcase Proto.in. He currently works with TeNet at the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras.

Photo Courtesy: Vijay Anand

Rediff Invests in Mobile Startup Vakow

I have no idea which RD Burman song has the word Vakow!, but it was powerful enough for die-hard RD fans Rahul Gupta and Amit Upadhyay to pick as the name of their startup. Vakow! was in the news today for tying up some funding (amount and stake undisclosed) from Rediff. The Mumbai-based startup, which formally launched last October, offers an SMS-based mobile networking/content sharing service, something like Twitter.

So how will/does Vakow make money? ‘We don’t make any money now,’ comes cofounder Rahul Gupta’s candid response, very quickly. But they hope to and advertising seems to be the chief revenue channel they have in mind. The two didn’t earn a salary from their business until 2-3 months ago, which is actually when the Rediff investment happened. Otherwise, cost of operations are pretty low though an exact break-up isn’t available. For Rediff this is an strategic investment ans Vakow may eventually be acquired by the Nasdaq-listed firm.

At 28 and 27 respectively, Gupta and co-founder Amit Upadhyay have been around quite a bit after graduating from IIT Bombay in 2003. “We wanted to be entrepreneurs from day one,” says Upadhyay. So back in 2001-2002 they started work on their first project — a smart landline phone. It didn’t go too far and after shutting down that project they joined Rakesh Mathur’s new Internet startup Webaroo. Gupta was senior product manager and Upadhyay was senior software engineer. The two quit last January and debuted their company at BarCamp Mumbai2 on October 9th.

What others are saying about the deal

Copyright Cribs

Boston Analytics looks like a decent enough company. Its business is research and analytics and among other things, it brings out research reports on private equity investments. In April, the firm released a report on private equity investments in India. But it turns out that the report lifted copyrighted data from Chennai-based Venture Intelligence’s private equity deal database.

What seems to have happened, going by Venture Intelligence’s press release, is that Boston Analytics bought Venture Intelligence’s database and then used that information to compile its own report and sell it in the market. Juvenile conduct for a company whose management team hails from institutions such as MIT and the Indian Institute of Management. Now Venture Intelligence has won a High Court injunction against that copyright violation. So looks like the matter has been laid to rest.

Walden Re-enters India

I never quite expected Rajesh Subramaniam, the former CFO of business process outsourcing company Firstsource Solutions, to turn up in the venture capital business. Known within Firstsource as the M&A specialist, he definitely lived up to the tag — seven acquisitions in almost as many years and the last one a whopper — the $330 million acquisition of US healthcare insurance services company MedAssist. Subsequently there has been talk that Firstsource itself has become an acquisition target but all of this is still speculation.

With his track record, Subramaniam would be any top notch private equity firm’s pick. Maybe he doesn’t like private equity that much. But even if his interest leaned towards venture capital, why Walden looked more interesting than others is not so clear. The San Francisco-headquartered, technology focused firm has well-established global credentials and was one of the earliest US venture capital firms to see the cross-border investing opportunity in emerging markets. Except that while most cross-border investors focus on one or two countries — say US-India or US-China — Walden went into China, India, Singapore, Malaysia and Taiwan (also Israel). And this was a strategy it had worked out in 1987. But the firm has not had such a happy outing in India.

Subramaniam’s appointment marks Walden’s re-entry in India after about five years — the one notable investment from the past is MindTree. The firm seems to have set up an office of sorts in Bangalore on Brunton Road, in the same building (same floor) that houses Silicon Valley Bank. There is no mention of Subramaniam joining the firm anywhere on the website, so I’ll go with the Business Line report for now. He is also the firm’s third India chief after Sudhir Sethi and Dinesh Vaswani. Sethi led investments here for four years till April 2002. He now heads IDG Ventures India. Vaswani moved from Walden’s US offices in 2002 to replace Sethi but he quit in about two years to join Bessemer Venture Partners. He is now a managing director with Temasek Holdings.

Since Vaswani’s exit Walden has not had any sort of presence in India, which is unfortunate because 2004 onwards, India’s venture capital market exploded. And despite having an early mover advantage in India, the absence in the last five-odd years could cost. Newer and later entrants have built strong reputations and, importantly, have pretty robust networks on the ground. Walden, ironically, will be the new entrant in this phase of venture investing in India.

Unconferencing in Asia

It might be fun to go Barcamping around Asia. It would not be too expensive and probably quite an eye-opener. I’m seriously planning an itinerary and decided to start with the BarCamp wiki to get a fix on the activity across the region. Some of things I learned amused and surprised me:

  1. You cannot access the BarCamp wiki if you are in China (says this blogger’s post)
  2. Malaysia is having its first BarCamp this July. When you’re sitting in India where a BarCamp happens once a week (almost), that sounds LATE. They have something called a ‘hangout time’ which starts at 6.00 am on Saturday and continues into Sunday morning.
  3. The party spirit continues in Thailand, which is having its third BarCamp later this month. Party is officially on the agenda.
  4. Cambodia’s first BarCamp comes up a little later in September and the highlight of this event, according to me, is going to be, again, the evening party — people have been requested to show up with their national beers. Goa’s Kings beer is what I would take along :-)

India does seem to be well ahead in the evolution curve as far as barcamping goes. The rest of Asia, or at least South East Asia, seems to be waking up to it now. Wonder why and maybe the best way to find out is to hit the road.

Image Courtesy: Barcamp Wiki

Limited Partner China

China is at it again. Chinese government agency, State Administration of Foreign Exchange (Safe), is putting $2.5 billion into TPG’s new fund, says the Financial Times. This becomes the third flank opened by China in recent times to edge into the private equity business.

Last year the government-backed sovereign wealth fund, China Investment Corporation (CIC), bought a 10 per cent stake in Blackstone for $3 billion, just ahead of its initial public offering. Post-Blackstone, CIC has been busy actioning new investment plans — see the Reuters report. Meanwhile, domestic pension fund National Council for Social Security Fund has turned limited partner for domestic buyout funds such as CDH Capital and Hony Capital — Bloomberg report here.

Both TPG and Blackstone are active investors in India, so that gives China an indirect piece of Indian assets. TPG is currently investing in India out of $4 billion Asia fund, 25 per cent of which is supposed to be invested here. Plus, more will come along from the new $17 billion fund it is raising — the one Safe has just invested in. With all the money that China is throwing around wouldn’t it make sense for Indian funds to pitch for some as well? Maybe some have already raised money from China via limited partners based in Hong Kong and Singapore. However they do it, and I’m sure political sensitivities make it a bit tricky, China’s resources could help Indian funds reduce their dependence on North American and European investors.

Linkedin Valued at $1 Billion

Professional networking site LinkedIn raised $53 million in fourth round funding yesterday from Bain Capital Ventures and other existing investors. The latest round values the Mountain View, California-based company at over $1 billion, claims its CEO Dan Nye. Read the Reuters report. That is still a long way from the $15 billion Facebook was valued at last year when Microsoft invested $240 million in the social networking startup. But it’s okay. I’m sure the LinkedIn guys aren’t complaining. Check out the company’s blog and the video interview with the new investors.